Improvement of the estimation model of turbidity removal efficiency in helical tubular flocculators: Understanding process physics and their interrelationship with treatment efficiency

Name: Bruno Peterle Vaneli
Type: MSc dissertation
Publication date: 30/09/2016
Advisor:

Name Rolesort descending
Edmilson Costa Teixeira Advisor *

Examining board:

Name Rolesort descending
Edmilson Costa Teixeira Advisor *
William Bonino Rauen External Examiner *
Julio Tomás Aquije Chacaltana Internal Examiner *

Summary: Oliveira (2014) developed models (linear and nonlinear) to estimate the efficiency in removal of turbidity in Helically Coiled Tube Flocculators (Portuguese acronym: FTHs), linking process efficiency with the seven representative dimensional parameters of geometry (&#119863;/&#119889; e &#119901;/&#119871;), hydraulics (&#119862;&#119886; e &#119877;&#119890;) and hydrodynamics (&#119878;&#119899;, &#119864;&#119886;&#119889;&#119898; e &#119867;&#119886;&#119889;&#119898;) of these units. In this work, three aspects of the proposed models are taken for improvement. I) by producing the greatest Determination coefficient, Oliveira (2014) took the non-linear model as a reference. However, the mean relative deviation produced by linear model was lower than that observed in the non-linear model; II) a laminar model was used in the ambit of a computational fluid dynamic modelling (CFD) to model the air flow in the FTHs that were higher than the critical Reynolds (&#119877;&#119890;&#119888;) – the value that marks the end of the laminar regime and the beginning of the transition regime; III) Amongst the hydrodynamic parameters incorporated in the models developed, a normal pressure gradient which is an important parameter in characterizing secondary flow was not found. As a result, the linear model proposed has greater ability to predict experimental data when compared to the non-linear model, and so was taken as a point of reference in improvement. In estimating the value of &#119877;&#119890;&#119888; in pipes with strong curvature (&#119863;/&#119889;&#8804;35,7) the use of the formula proposed by Kühnen et aI. (2015) is recommended. In pipes with medium (35,7<&#119863;/&#119889;&#8804;110) and slight curvatures (110<&#119863;/&#119889;) the formula proposed was that of Cioncolini and Santini (2006). So, in the acquisition of the hydrodynamic parameters, a laminar model was used to model the flow of the FTHs operating with &#119877;&#119890; lower than &#119877;&#119890;&#119888; and the &#119896;&#8722;&#120596; turbulence model in cases WHERE the flow was higher than &#119877;&#119890;&#119888;. When considering turbulence modeling, an improvement in the quality of the adjustment of the linear model proposed by Oliveira (2014) was found. It was determined that the average normal pressure gradient (&#119866;&#119875;&#119886;&#119889;&#119898;) must be considered in the model to model for efficiency estimation of turbidity removal. When considered, the parameters &#119878;&#119899; and &#119867;&#119886;&#119889;&#119898; came to be statistically insignificant, obtaining a simpler model with better statistics than the linear model proposed by Oliveira (2014).

Access to document

Acesso à informação
Transparência Pública

© 2013 Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo. Todos os direitos reservados.
Av. Fernando Ferrari, 514 - Goiabeiras, Vitória - ES | CEP 29075-910